Lawyer Resume
If a field is marked "n/a" or is empty, it means this lawyer has not yet filled in this information.
Cameron T | DC
Years in practice: 19
OTHER STATE BAR

District of Columbia, 2000

Law School

George Washington Law School

Malpractice Insurance
$2,000,000/$2,000,000
Not Verified
Languages spoken in the office
English
Affiliations
This Lawyer has not identified any affiliations
Recognition & Certifications
None listed
Important cases
Important cases:

Case Name: Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., No. 2:12-CV-00264 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Altera Corp., No. 2:2012-CV-00602 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Atmel Corp., No. 2:12-CV-00152 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Conexant Systems, Inc., No. 2:12-CV-00153 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Creative Technology Ltd., ZiiLabs Pte Ltd and Creative Labs Inc., No. 2:12-CV-00154 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., No. 2:12-CV-00155 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Mindspeed Technologies, Inc., No. 2:12-CV-00156 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. NVIDIA Corporation, No. 2:12-CV-00157 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. PMC-Sierra, Inc., No. 2:12-CV-00603 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Xilinx, Inc., No. 2:12-CV-00158 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2012); Advanced Processor Technologies LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc. , Conexant Systems, Inc. , Digi International Inc. , Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. , Micrel, Inc., Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. and Zoran Corp., No. 2:11-CV-00019 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 18, 2011). Representation of plaintiff Advanced Processor Technologies in asserting seminal semiconductor technology patents directed to memory management used through the semiconductor industry.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc., Nokia, Inc. and Ricoh Innovations, Inc., No. 3:12-CV-01217 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2012), transferred from No. 2:10-CV-00364 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2010); Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. Nokia Corporation and Ricoh Company, Ltd., No. 5:12-CV-01218 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2012), transferred from No. 2:10-CV-00365 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2010); Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. A9.com, Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc., Nokia, Inc. and Ricoh Innovations, Inc., No. 4:12-CV-01219 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2012), transferred from No. 2:10-CV-00577 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2010); Wireless Recognition Technologies LLC v. Nokia Corporation and Ricoh Company, Ltd., No. 5:12-CV-01220 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2012), transferred from No. 2:10-CV-00578 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2010). Representation of plaintiff in multiple infringement actions against leading defendants in a matter regarding infringement of patents directed to mobile recognition of objects and documents.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp., No. 1:07-CV-02582 (N.D. Ill. May 8, 2007). Representation of plaintiff UTStarcom, a global leader in the manufacture of IP-based solutions and end-to-end telecommunications networking in misappropriation of trade secrets, copyright infringement, and patent infringement relating to geographically mapped telephone routing methods and systems.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: Texas Instruments Inc. v. PowerChip Semiconductor Corp., No. 1:2006-CV-02305 (S.D. N.Y. Mar. 24, 2006). Representation of PowerChip Semiconductor in an alleged breach of a contractual matter and a claim for over $150 million dollars in damages.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: Telarix v. Vero Systems/TEOCO, No. 1:08-CV-00587 (E.D. Va. June 5, 2008). Representation of defendant computer software maker in a patent suit involving software relating to optimal cost routing in telecommunication networks.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: Network Gateway Solutions, LLC v. Adtran, Inc., Audiocodes Ltd., Audiocodes Inc., Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., Genband Inc., Juniper Networks,Inc., Alcatel-Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Media5 Corporation, Mediatrix Telecom Inc., Metaswitch Inc., Mitel Networks Corporation, Mitel Networks Inc., Multi-Tech Systems Inc., Patton Electronics Co., Quintum Technologies LLC, Siemens AG, Siemens Corporation, Sonus Networks Inc. and Zhone Technologies Inc., No. 1:2009-CV-00667 (D. Del. Sep. 4, 2009). Representation of defendants Media5 Corporation and Mediatrix Telecom, Inc., pioneering Voice-over-IP (VoIP) telecommunications equipment manufacturers, in a matter alleging infringement of plaintiff’s digital network access server patent.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: Morningware, Inc. v. Hearthware Home Products, Inc., No. 1:2009-CV-04348 (N.D. Ill. July 20, 2009). Representation of defendant/counterclaimant in action involving infringement of patent directed to cookware technology, trade dress infringement, unfair competition and product disparagement under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, deceptive trade practices under Illinois state law, common law unfair competition and commercial disparagement.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: Hearthware, Inc. v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. (Emson), No. 1:2011-CV-05233 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 2, 2011). Representation of plaintiff in action involving federal copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq., federal trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and common law, false association/designation of origin and unfair competition under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), deceptive trade practices under Illinois law, 815 I.L.C.S. § 510, and unfair competition and deceptive trade practices under the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, 815, I.L.C.S. § 505/2.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: Agere Systems Guardian Corp. v. Proxim, Inc., No. 1:01-CV-00339 (D. Del. May 23, 2001). Representation of plaintiff in infringement action concerning patents related to wireless technology under IEEE 802.11 standard.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: AIM IP, LLC v. Media5 Corporation, No. 8:2013-CV-00187 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013). Represent defendant in a patent infringement matter alleging violation of a telecommunications standard.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Case Name: Atwater Partners of Texas LLC v. AT&T, Inc., Actiontec Electronics, Inc., ADTRAN, Inc., Allied Telesis, Inc., Billion Electric Co. Ltd., BEC Technologies, Inc., Broadcom Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Systems (USA) Pte. Ltd., Cisco Systems International BV, Comtrend Corporation, Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc., Enablence Technologies, Inc., Mindspeed Technologies, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Netopia Inc., Netgear Inc., Occam Networks, Inc., Rad Data Communications, Ltd., Rad Communications, Inc., Shareband Technologies, LLC, Tellabs, Inc., Wintegra, Inc., Zhone Technologies, Inc. and ZyXEL Communications, Inc., No. 2:10-CV-00175 (E.D. Tex. May 27, 2010). Represented defendants Comtrend Corporation and Consolidated Communications Holdings in a patent infringement suit involving alleged infringement of modem related telecommunications technologies.

Amount Recovered: $0.000

Number of Plaintiffs: 0

Membership

ABA, AIPLA, BADC, ITechLaw, Techlaw Group

Case Categories
• Ponzi Schemes • Divorce • Commercial Litigation
• Copyright • Patent • Trademark
• Trade Secret
PEER REVIEW RATINGS
Martindle Hubbell
NA
CHAMBERS
NA
OTHER
NA
CLIENTS REVIEW RATINGS
Martindle Hubbell
NA
AVVO
NA
YELP
NA